Playbook Hybrid work in IT: The operating model for a productive corporate culture

Some teams are more productive than ever when working from home, while others struggle with isolation, inefficient meetings, and cultural erosion. So what makes the difference?

One thing above all else: viewing hybrid work as more than just a technical setup. It is an operating model that needs to be designed consciously, strategically, and as closely as possible to your team.

Hybrid IT teams have long been a reality. But they are by no means a guarantee of better collaboration, healthier employees, or higher performance. Anyone who sees hybrid work as merely a mix of working from home and being present in the office underestimates its impact on leadership, collaboration, and culture.

What really matters are processes, roles, and tools that are aligned with each other. An operating model that enables flexibility while creating commitment. This is exactly where successful companies start. They don't think of hybrid work as an exception, but as a structural response to complex working environments.

Today, we'll show you how to build a hybrid operating model that combines productivity and satisfaction.

‍

Diagnosis: Where do we really stand?

Hybrid working models are the status quo today – but many teams are still stuck. Meetings are too long, collaboration feels distant, and no one really knows who is working on what. Does this sound familiar?

Then it's often not a lack of technology that's missing. It's transparency.

Transparency about how well your hybrid setup really works.

An honest check starts where it hurts:

• How do new colleagues experience their onboarding?
• Does informal communication work, or does everything remain purely functional?
• Do executives know who is overworked?
• And above all: How well do tools, processes, and leadership behaviors fit together?

Data shows that many companies overestimate the status quo. According to a recent survey of the tech sector, up to 45% of hybrid workers report that they do not feel sufficiently involved – even though their managers believe the opposite (t3n 2023). And one-third of employees in hybrid teams suffer from “digital loneliness” – they feel less seen than they did in the office (Deskbird 2025).

These gaps often go undetected because traditional performance metrics fail. Code commits, Jira tickets, or deploy numbers say little about how a team really works together. And tools such as pulse surveys or feedback rounds are rarely honest when psychological safety is lacking.

What actually helps:

A structured “hybrid readiness assessment.” Not a one-time survey, but a system that looks at culture, leadership, technology, and psychological well-being together. You don't need external consultants for this – just the courage to take a hard look at yourself.

Ask yourselves:

• How clear are the communication channels between remote and office workers?
• Do all team members have the same opportunities to contribute?
• When was the last time someone questioned the meeting structure?

You can only make informed decisions once you know where you stand. Anything else is just trying to optimize in the dark.

‍

Design: principles, policies, and team agreements

Do you want your team to work efficiently, motivated, and connected—no matter where they are? Then you don't need a set of rules, you need an operating system. One that is based on clear principles.

The most common mistake when setting up hybrid models is to stop at tool selection. Friction losses arise much earlier – when no one knows when and where people are working, what “availability” actually means, or which meetings are really necessary.

What do successful teams do differently?

They define the rules of the game together. And they do so deliberately.

Good hybrid work design starts with five simple but effective principles:

1. Transparency beats presence. Results and contributions must be visible – not just in calls.
2. Flexibility requires commitment. Freedom in terms of where requires clarity in terms of how.
3. Async first. If you bring every issue into the meeting, you lose your spotlight.
4. Equal participation, regardless of location. Remote work should not be a disadvantage.
5. Clarity is a management task. Those who lead in a hybrid model must actively shape frameworks, roles, and expectations.

What does that mean in concrete terms?

An example: Instead of setting a blanket rule of three office days per week, smart companies define context-based presence times: sprint changes, onboarding, retros – then it's worth coming into the office. Otherwise, the rule is: free choice.

Team agreements also help. No pages of guidelines, just simple agreements made together:

• How quickly do we respond on Slack?
• When do we block focus time?
• Which meetings are mandatory, which are optional?
• Which rituals strengthen our teamwork?

According to a 2022 SAP analysis, over 80% of hybrid employees say they feel more productive when they can decide for themselves how and where they work (SAP 2022). But this empowerment only works with clear structures.

If you don't structure hybrid work, chaos ensues. If you design it purposefully, flow emerges.

‍

Enable: Toolstack & AI in practice

Once your team knows how it wants to work together, it's time for tools that make that possible. But this is often where the second big mistake in hybrid working lies: management tries to replace culture with tools.

Technology is no substitute for trust. But it can accelerate it.

The difference between a functioning hybrid team and frustrated silo operations often lies in three things:

• How are decisions documented?
• How is knowledge distributed?
• How quickly do developers get from problem to solution?

Modern IT teams have long relied on async-first collaboration—written decision logs, scalable documentation, and reduced live time. No. No tool excesses, just targeted investments:

• Wikis that stay alive (e.g., Confluence, Notion)
• Task boards that are actually used (e.g., Linear, Jira)
• Code review workflows that promote discipline even remotely
• AI assistance for summaries, tests, documentation suggestions, and learning paths

According to a survey in the Lyreco Work Report 2024, over 70% of IT executives see the biggest challenge in the quality of collaboration among their hybrid teams – not in mere productivity (Lyreco 2024).

This is where AI comes in. Not as hype, but as a helper:

• It recognizes repetitive tasks and automates them.
• It improves onboarding through personalized learning paths.
• It creates meeting summaries or suggests pull request comments.
• It reduces context switching – an underestimated productivity killer.

Important: A hybrid toolset doesn't have to be perfect – but it does have to be clearly integrated. Even the best tools are useless if they don't contribute to common principles (see chapter 2). That's why every new tool needs a clear answer to the question: “What will it improve – and what will it eliminate?” Only then will technology become an enabler – and not a disruptive factor.

‍

Measure: Manage productivity and well-being

You can only improve what you measure. But in hybrid teams, it's no longer about presence time or perceived workload. It's about outcomes – and also about energy.

This starts with the question: What actually constitutes productivity?

Closing more tickets? Faster releases? Fewer bugs? Or a team that works well even under pressure?

Many companies rely on metrics that reflect neither efficiency nor team health. But there are better indicators available:

• Lead time for changes (how long does it take for a request to be rolled out?)
• Deployment frequency (how often do we release?)
• Team health checks (e.g., monthly assessments of focus, clarity, mood)
• Workload indicators (overtime, Slack activity outside core hours)

Particularly important: the link between productivity and mental health.

A recent study shows that 66% of employees experience an improvement in their mental well-being through hybrid working – but only if clear boundaries and a healthy pace of work are maintained (Deskbird 2025).

In concrete terms, this means:

• Agree on and adhere to availability limits
• Incorporate “micro-breaks” into meetings (e.g., 25/50 instead of 30/60 minutes)
• Clearly communicate that offline time is desirable and not a career killer

Leadership plays a key role here. Those who constantly respond late in the evening send the wrong signal without meaning to. And those who never talk about stress will never get honest feedback.

A hybrid operating model is not a rigid construct. It is a living mechanism. And this mechanism needs feedback. In real time, regularly, honestly. The good news is that those who measure productivity and well-being recognize patterns. And those who recognize patterns can manage better.

‍

Conclusion: Hybrid means shaping, not managing

Hybrid working does not work on its own. It is not an add-on or a temporary compromise – it is a separate operating model. Those who do it well win: better collaboration, healthier teams, higher productivity.

This requires four things:

• Honest diagnosis
• Clear principles and team rules
• Technically sound enablement
• And the willingness to measure energy as well as output

The most successful IT teams in a hybrid setting are not the ones with the coolest office space or the fastest Slack channel. They are the ones who know how they work – and why. When you not only allow hybrid work, but systematically design it, you make it strong. For your team. For your organization. And for the future of collaboration.

Want to know how hybrid your team really works—and where culture, leadership, or tooling are holding you back?
We support you with a clear view, practical experience, and strategies that balance productivity and team health. Get in touch—we look forward to hearing from you.

‍

Sources

Deskbird (2025): So wirkt sich hybrides Arbeiten auf die mentale Gesundheit der Mitarbeitenden aus.
Lyreco (2024): Herausforderungen hybrider Arbeitsmodelle – Wie Unternehmen mit Kultur und Struktur gegensteuern können.
SAP (2022): Flexibel arbeiten: Hybrides Arbeiten – was Psychologen denken.
t3n (2023): Remote oder zurück ins Büro? Neue Zahlen zeigen, wie es um die hybride Arbeit steht.
Accenture (2021): The future of work: productive anywhere – internal study with over 10,000 respondents.